just for us
The decoder, first look
This page needs the admin key. Open your sign-in link first, or ask David for a fresh one.
what real people told us
The skills research, and a first sketch of the decoder
We went and read what people say when they try the skills from your workbook at home, on their own, on hard days. Around 108 real conversations, covering all 26 skills. This page is the short version, plus the idea it keeps pointing at. Nothing here is published anywhere. Your word is the last word on all of it.
Everything was read on public forums, kept anonymous, and rewritten in our own words. No names, and no quotes that could be traced back to anyone.
The big findings
Eight patterns kept coming back, whatever the skill.
Practising in calm is everything
The single most repeated piece of advice, for every skill. People who practised on ordinary days could use a skill on the worst day. People who first tried it mid-crisis decided it did not work.
You have been saying exactly this all along. The research agrees with you, loudly.
Wrong expectations sink skills
The top reason a skill gets abandoned is not doing it wrong. It is expecting too much. The cold water reset takes people from unbearable to manageable, not to happy. Nobody warns them, so they mark it failed.
Long-term practisers of the pause skill reckon they catch about 85% of moments, after months of practice. That honesty helps people keep going.
Every skill has a working range
Breathing exercises work below roughly a 6 out of 10, and can make things worse above it. Talking skills need you calmer than a 6 first. Naming which range a skill lives in relieved people rather than putting them off.
People build ladders, not scripts
Almost nobody uses the textbook version. They build graded menus: bowl of cold water, or an ice pack, or a cold drink, or cold air. The workbook can offer the ladder instead of pretending there is one right way.
Different minds need different versions
ADHD, autistic, and easily overwhelmed readers each hit the same walls again and again, and each have known ways round them. This is not a rare edge case. It came up constantly.
Example: the famous 5-4-3-2-1 grounding is too slow for a racing mind. Fast colour-naming works better.
Permission lines matter most
The sentences people were most grateful for were permissions. Stopping is allowed. Warmth counts if cold feels wrong. A written no counts. It can feel worse before it feels better.
Get things ready before the storm
The people a skill worked for had decided in advance. The ice pack already in the freezer. The plan already written on a card. The message already rehearsed on a calm walk. Crisis moments are for reaching, not deciding.
The acronyms are a wall
Letter codes like DEAR MAN are too much to hold in a wound-up mind, even by the fans. And one renaming unlocked a whole skill: several people only got "radical acceptance" when someone called it "radical acknowledgement".
The blockers that stop people before page one
These came up before technique even entered the picture. People fight these fights first, and lose them quietly.
"I don't deserve comfort"
Owners of beautiful self-soothe kits who never open them when upset. The page has to answer this before any technique can land.
"Distraction is cheating"
People feel guilty using distraction skills, as if it were avoidance. The answer the community gives: a bridge, not a home.
"If I'm gentle, I'll be a doormat"
People with a pleasing history hear "kind manner" as "give in". They need to hear the ask stays in the sentence.
"These are magic words, and I'm not stupid"
Kindness practices fail on believability, not mechanics. What converted the biggest sceptic: early repetitions are supposed to feel like nothing, the way early strokes of a path-clearing walk look like nothing.
"It didn't fix me, so it failed"
The expectation problem again, and it belongs on this list too, because it stops the second attempt.
Why this matters: these five fights could be the front of the book. Meeting people in the blocked place before asking anything of them. That is not our invention. It is what you already do in person, on paper.
The decoder: a first sketch
The idea this research keeps pointing at.
A reader does not arrive knowing skill names. They arrive with a moment. The question that sorts nearly every moment is not "which skill?" but "how much is it, right now?", plus whether the moment is coming, happening, or over. Situations are endless, but the states behind them are few. That is what makes a map possible at all.
The adjustments layer
Whichever door someone walks through, these travel with them.
Racing, restless mind
- Fast versions: colour-naming beats slow sense-counting
- Reminders outside the head: alarms, cards, lists
Takes words literally
- Plain instructions, no figurative language
- Clear steps with a defined end, not open-ended tasks
Hard memories in the picture
- Attention outward (sounds, objects), not inward, in doses of seconds
- Warmth is a full substitute where cold or breath makes it worse
Can't name feelings
- Start from the body: where is it, what does it feel like
- Feeling words come later, and that is normal
Body has limits
- Every physical step has a gentler version that counts
- Skipping a component is using the skill, not failing it
Your calls
Your word is the last word, on all of it. One question matters most.
Does "how much is it, right now?" match what you see?
The whole idea rests on sorting by state, not by skill name. You have watched real people in real moments. If this sorting feels wrong, we go back to the drawing board, happily.
Do the six door names sound like you? Say them out loud: too much to think, upset but still thinking, empty and can’t start, something hard is coming, upset about what happened, a problem with a person.
These need to be your words, not ours. Our naming rule so far: each door says what the person would say to themselves in that moment. Plain words, no imagery (an earlier draft said "churned up" and David could not pin down what it meant, which settled the rule).
Should the five blockers open the workbook, before any skill?
A short, warm front section: for the reader who already suspects this will not work for them.
Could the decoder be its own thing, as well as living in the workbook?
You have seen the flowcharts on Etsy. This would be our version, with the research behind it. No rush on this one at all.
Everything on this page is a draft for the two of you. Nothing is published, listed, or printed. The workbooks stay educational, not therapy, and every product page carries that line plus crisis contacts. Samaritans: 116 123, free, any hour.